AC Elder Letter

"This We Continue to Believe" elder letter posted just below, just scroll down.

***UPDATE*** 
There are now 7 letters/papers on this site

paper #1 This We Continue to Believe, 5 Elder paper July 2010
paper #2 Preservation Effort Letter July 2012
paper #3 A letter from Preservation AC's to church leadership May 2009
paper #4 A document on sin and the blood of Christ
paper #5 A document on Hebrews
paper #6 A document on Romans 7
paper #7 A detailed piece of propaganda with many falsehoods from either dishonesty or ignorance May 2012

This group has not been dormant the past 2 years since the 5 elder letter. They continue to send out material with the same heresy. Its supporters include a portion of current AC elders and ministers as well as all those breaking away to meet separately

A fuller response to this movement can be found here:  http://responsetoacpreservationmovement.blogspot.com 

To the discerning reader,

The historic Christian doctrines denied and heresy affirmed by the these elders and this preservation movement include:

1. Original sin, the imputed guilt and sin of Adam to all men.
They believe in the innocence of all men before a certain undetermined age at which point the person becomes a sinner and is counted as guilty of condemnation.

 2. Justification by faith alone.  
They affirm the Roman Catholic doctrine of justification by faith plus works.
Roman Catholics believe: faith + works -> justification
The biblical doctrine: faith alone -> justification + works

3. The imputed righteousness of Christ.
Again, they affirm the Roman Catholic doctrine of "infused" righteousness, or that the believer's own good works become the basis for their justification. This is separate and distinct from the biblical doctrine of progressive sanctification. The biblical doctrine is that Christ's active and passive obedience and perfect righteousness is imputed to believers by faith alone and on that basis are justified.

4. Blood atonement for all sin.
They deny that sins after baptism are paid for by Christ. They separate Christ's intercessory work from His atoning work. The biblical doctrine is sin cannot be removed or atoned for outside the the blood of Christ. His intercessory work is entirely based and derived from His atoning work. All sins of all believers are covered by the blood of Christ and atoned for.

5. Sin is sin.
They affirm that a believer can have failings and shortcomings that are not actually sin. This is simply a man-made redefinition of sin that has no basis in Scripture. It is also a rejection of the holiness of God.

There are further heretical beliefs but these are the most severe and what defines their gospel as accursed/anathema. This is a false gospel of legalism and falsehood that borrows heavily from historical Roman Catholic beliefs. It has been perpetuated by wolves in sheep's clothing. This gospel will not save.

The Gospel (all too briefly):
A believer is saved by grace ALONE as a gift, not as a rewards or as wages due him. Justification/peace with God is achieved by faith ALONE (faith is also a gift) apart from works. Works are an inevitable result of true saving faith, but are never part of the basis for our right standing with God. Our faith is in Christ alone and His righteousness is imputed to believers just as our sins are imputed to Him on the cross. This is the basis for our justification in the eyes of God; Christ's righteousness, not our own.


___________________________________________________________________
Paper #1 This we continue to Believe, 5 elder letter July 2010 


July 12, 2010

Greetings, brothers, in the Risen Savior's name:

We are taught in Revelation 2:5 to "repent and do the first works," and in Revelation 3:2 to "be watchful, and strengthen the things which remain, that are ready to die." It is our desire, by the grace of God, to do what we can to further these scriptural directives given to us.

We are endorsing a document entitled "This We Continue to Believe." It contains nothing new, but reflects rather, a continuing belief in our long-standing doctrine and church practices. We are not interested in a new doctrine. We plan to continue with these beliefs and practices in our congregations and plead with you brothers to support us and others in the Apostolic Christian Church who desire to do the same.

We recognize from past experience that changes and modifications to a document such as this would be non-ending. Pease accept this document as it is written. We feel strongly that many of our brethren will be encouraged and strengthened by our desire to retain these beliefs and practices.

If you have any questions, concerns, or encouragement, please contact anyone of us

May God bless our effort,

Least ones in Christ:

Peter Petrovic (San Diego)
Lawrence Luthi (Lamar)
David Graf (Akron)
Wayne Grimm (West Bend)
Ben Walder (Congerville)


This We Continue to Believe

We brothers who are the under-shepherds of traditional churches are beginning to question whether we will be able to continue in some of the long held beliefs and practices of the Apostolic Christian church which have been prevalent in our congregations. We have listed some of these below. This is not intended to be an inclusive list of beliefs or practices, but rather point out areas where we feel pressure to change. Beliefs or practices not listed do not indicate that we don't support them.

We plan to continue with these beliefs and practices in our congregations and we plead with you brothers to support us and others in the Apostolic Christian Church who desire to do the same.

1. We believe in order to become a child of God, a soul must:

a. Have faith in the death, shed blood, and resurrection of Jesus Christ (1)
b. Humbly repent (2), confess his sins to God before an Elder, and make restitution as far as possible (3)
c. Willingly separate from former sinful and worldly activities (4)
d. Permit the Lord to convert him by having a broken and contrite spirit

Through this a convert is granted peace with God and man (5). We believe that as a fruit of true conversion, a convert must be obedient to the interpretation of the Word and practices (some further discussed below) of the Apostolic Christian church before baptism (6). Then they are a fit temple for the Holy Spirit, are qualified to make a covenant with God, be baptized, and become a member of the Body of Christ (7).

2. We believe after baptism faithfulness to God includes faithfulness to God's Word and Spirit and long standing church practices, including the teachings given through the memorandum (8).

3. We believe we should continue to have provings where we allow the Spirit to work within the brethren to prove if a convert has truly become converted. Lay brethren should be respected if they are not satisfied with the repentance and conversion of a convert. Provings should be closed to non-members so brethren can freely express themselves (9).

4. We believe we have a hope (versus confidence) of having an everlasting life. To maintain that hope we must live an overcoming life by grace, free of sin, which we can only do by walking in the Spirit, striving to follow the example of Jesus Christ and staying close to the Word of God (10).

5. We believe in the additional following doctrinal truths regarding sin, Christ's blood, conversion, and a sanctified life:

  1. That repentance, conversion, and baptism are God's process whereby a soul can find remission of his sins, have his old man of sin destroyed, and arise to a newness of life (11).
  2. The shed blood of Christ atones for sins prior to conversion, but does not atone for current and future sins of a believer (12).
  3. That following our conversion, by the grace and power of God, we do not and should not have to continue sinning (13).
  4. That by receiving the gifts of the indwelling Holy Spirit and the grace of God, a child of God who doeth righteousness is righteous (14).
  5. That there are faults and failings in a believer’s life that are not sin and are not interchangeable with sin (15).
  6. That there are different types and depths of sin, including sins unto death (16).
  7. That we can sin if we do not listen to the Holy Spirit and avail ourselves of the gift of grace (17).
  8. That if we sin as a child of God we can find forgiveness through the advocacy of Christ at the right hand of God and through continuous Scripturally applied discipline (18). Because Christ came in the flesh and paid the price for our sins on Calvary, He has become our Advocate (19).
  9. That there are grievous sins for which there can be no restoration to full membership and which fall beyond the judgment of the church. We believe such a soul can be saved, but the judgment is left to God (20).
  10. That discipline, ranging from self-discipline through excommunication with the ban, is an essential part of God’s plan to deal with failings, shortcomings, and any sin in the life of a child of God (21).
  11. That good works wrought by faith, grace, and the Holy Spirit, are an integral part of salvation; are brought forth joyfully; and will be a part of our final judgment (22).

6. We believe we should have close spiritual fellowship only with brethren In the Apostolic Christian church. Even though we develop friendships with many other associates we should not join them in spiritual activities to avoid deception. We don’t judge them as God will be the judge of all, but we maintain separation from them (23).

7. We believe, as provided in our Statement of Faith, that we should embrace the King James Version of the Bible as the foundation of our doctrine. We should avoid using other versions. When leading in prayer our Brothers should use the language of this King James Version (24).

8. We believe we must guard our homes very carefully because Satan is very subtle and will sneak in if we give an opening. We believe television and video entertainment are worldly influences and have no justification in the Believer’s home or life (25). We believe the internet and other technology can be a tool of Satan. While it may be necessary for our business or schooling, it must be properly filtered and monitored very diligently, to protect our families and ourselves from being entangled in this insidious device (26). Unwholesome reading material and unwholesome music, including contemporary Christian music and concerts, should also be kept out of a Believer’s home and Life (27).

9. We believe America and most other nations are becoming addicted to all kinds of entertainment which should not be apart of a Believer’s life. We believe we should not be involved in organized sports or athletics as a participant or spectator (28).

10. We believe outward appearance is included in our reflection of the heart's desire to please God. Outward appearance should show separation from the world through modesty and simplicity. We believe brothers and sisters should not follow fashionable trends and casualness. It is also not appropriate for a believer to wear revealing or tight clothing that is sensual or attracts inappropriate attention, including shorts and short skirts. The edges should not be pushed, but rather carefulness exercised in our daily walk of life (29).

11. We believe Satan is attempting to confuse us and blur the line of distinction between the role of man and woman as defined in the Bible. Therefore, we believe a Sister in the Lord should not wear pants unless required for modesty when engaged in a specific activity (30).

12. We believe a Sister should not use makeup on her body, including painting of finger and toenails, which is worldly fashion (31).

13. We believe it is essential that Believers Wear modest clothing when we go to the house of God or assemble with our brethren and friends. A Godly woman should have her head covered with veiling that is large enough and heavy enough that it can easily be seen and worn on the top of her head, have her legs covered with hosiery, and wear modest footwear (32). Likewise, a Godly man when assembling in the house of God for worship should be attired in a modest suit and tie with a while shirt, which has been our practice for many years (33). Children should also be expected to dress appropriately and respectfully as they are in the house of God.

14. We believe the Bible is clear that a woman should have long hair and it should be put up in accordance with our long-standing practice to show a spirit of submission as the Bible instructs. A man's hair should be short and neatly trimmed and facial hair should be absent. Humility of heart should be shown through simplicity, neatness, and lack of interest in the latest trends and styles that include gels and other enhancements (34).

15. We believe unity and like-mindedness includes consistent application of the Word in areas of broad significance among believers in a brotherhood. Diversity of doctrine and application is not pleasing to God (35).

16. We believe following the established order and traditions of the church is following the Word. It is not following the commandments of men as were the Jewish additions to the Old law. Our traditions have proven to provide safety and promote the doctrine (36).

17. We believe single group activities should be very focused on spiritual activities or good works. Playing games leads to inappropriate interaction and thoughts between Brothers and Sisters. It feeds the flesh instead of the Spirit. Dating and established carnal relationships are works of the flesh (37). We also believe approved hymnals should be used for singings. Praise singings are not appropriate.

18. We believe that further study and examination of our doctrine and church practice is unnecessary (38).

19. We believe disobedience to the interpretation of the Word and practices (some discussed above) of the Apostolic Christian church causes discord among brethren. When one is disobedient, it emboldens others. This diminishes the purpose and importance of the church as the Body of Christ within the life of a believer (39).

Peter Petrovic, Lawrence Luthi, David Graf, Wayne Grimm, Ben Walder


References:

(1)     John 20:27-29, Romans 3:24-26, Romans 5:1, Galatians 2:20
(2)     Matthew 4:17, Mark 1:15, Acts 2:37-38, James 4:6-10
(3)     1 John 1:8-9, Romans 10:10, Acts 19:18-19, Matthew 3:6
(4)     Ephesians 4:21-24, Colossians 3:1-10
(5)     Matthew 18:3-4, Acts 3:19, Romans 5:1, Romans 12:18
(6)     Romans 6:14, Colossians 2:10-12
(7)     John 3:5, Romans 6:3-8, I Corinthians 12:13-14
(8)     1 Corinthians 11:1-2, Acts 16:22-32
(9)     Proving Candidates for Baptism (Apostolic Christian Publications), Pages 6-7
(10)  Galatians 5:16-18
(11)  Colossians 2:10-14
(12)  Colossians 1:13-14, Hebrews 9:15, 2 Peter 1:8-9, Romans 3:25-26, Hebrews 9:25-28, Hebrews 7:27, Hebrews 10:16-18, Hebrews 10:26-29
(13)  1 John 5:3-4, Revelation 3:5, Revelation 21:7, 1 John 3:8-10, Jude 1:24-25, Thessalonians 3:3
(14)  1 John 2:29,1 John3:7, Ephesians 2:10, Timothy 3:17, Titus 2:6-7, Titus 2:13-14, Colossians 1:27-29, John15:8, John 15:16, Romans 6:22
(15)  Galatians 6:1, James 5:15-16
(16)  John 19:11, 1 John 5:16-17
(17)  Jude 20-21, Ephesians 4:30, 2 Peter 2:20-22
(18)  1 John 2:1
(19)  Hebrews 9:11-28
(20)  1 John 5:16, 1 Corinthians 5:11-13, Hebrews 13:4
(21)  1 Corinthians 11:31-32, Hebrews 12:5-8, 1 Timothy 5:20, Jude 22-23, 1 Corinthians 5:13
(22)  Matthew 16:27, Revelation 20:12
(23)  2 Corinthians 6:17-18, 1 Corinthians 5:12-13
(24)  Revelation 2:18-19, see Memorandums (1957, 1952, 1972, 1976, 1982, 1995)
(25)  1 Thessalonians 5:22, Romans 1:32, Galatians 5:16-21, see Memorandums (1948- current)
(26)  see Memorandums (1995, 1997, current)
(27)  Unwholesome Music, see Memorandums (1974, 1984, 1987, 1992, 1993, 1994); Christian Rock, see Memorandums ;1986, 1992, 1994); Dangers of Religious Books, see Memorandums(1974, 1981)
(28)  Galatians 5:21, 1 Peter 4:3, Corinthians 10:7
(29)  Romans 12:2, 1 Peter 3:3-4, 1 Timothy 2:9-10, Revealing or Tight Clothing, see Memorandums (1975, 1976); Shorts or Short Skirts, see Memorandums (1962, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1974, 1975, 1976, 1980, 1982, 1984, 1988, 1992, 1995, 2005)
(30)  Pants on Sisters, see Memorandums (1980, 1982, 1988); Pantsuits, see Memorandums (l971, 1972, 1974, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1982, 1983, 1990)
(31)  Makeup, see Memorandums(1962, 1964, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1983, 1987, 1988, 1995)
(32)  1 Corinthians11:5-6; Proper Veiling see Memorandums (1954, 1955, 1986, 1993)
(33)  Modesty In Brothers' Clothing, see Memorandums (1974, 1975, 1976, 1979, 1982, 1992, 1997)
(34)  Corinthians 11:14-15, Sisters' Hair, see Memorandums (1945 -current); Brothers' Hair, see Memorandums (1969- current)
(35)  1 Peter 3:8, Philippians 1:27, Philippians 2:2, Ephesians 4:4-6, 2 Corinthians 13-11
(36)  1 Corinthians 11:2, Philippians 3:1, 1 Timothy 1:9-10, Romans3:20
(37)  Dating, see Memorandums (1965, 1976, 1977, 1997)
(38)  2 Peter 3:15-18
(39)  1 Corinthians5:6-8, 1 Corinthians 8:l0-13, 1 Corinthians 10:28-33


Paper #2 - NEW Letter from Preservation AC's - July 2012


Preservation Effort
July 2012

The Preservation Effort is an effort to preserve the long standing doctrine and practices of the Apostolic Christian Faith.  This effort is actually a result of the seemingly irreconcilable differences in doctrine and practice prevalent within the Apostolic Christian Church, with the recent events at Morris and Lamar only being the final catalyst for this effort to begin.  There have been many rumors and statements across the land.  We would like to address some of them and also express our intentions.

It is being said that we are leaving and thereby causing a split.  We are not leaving but staying with the Apostolic Christian Faith.  Those who believe a different doctrine, practice a different lifestyle, and pursue a New Evangelical way are leaving the Apostolic Christian Faith.

It is being said that we are sowing seeds of discord.  We are not sowing seeds.  We remain connected to the vine and desire to continue bringing forth fruit which is the evidence of this connection.  The seeds being sown are a different and New Evangelical doctrine.

It is being said that this effort will result in a rules-based Amish or German-type church.  These rumors are intended to frighten seeking souls and portray the preservation effort in a false light.  There is no intent to change our doctrine, its application and our long-standing traditions.

It is being said that this is a split like the German, mustache, liberal churches leaving, and those caused by leaving overly rigid churches.  This is not a split on our part but an effort to preserve our Faith.  We fully intend to stay with the Apostolic Faith.

It is being said that in this effort we are looking to man.  We are rather continuing to look to God’s Word and the leading of the Holy Spirit for direction as we have always done.

We believe in and will practice no new doctrine or its application and traditions but continue in that which we have long believed.

·         Jesus Christ gave His life on Calvary’s cross and His precious blood was shed as a ransom for all.  He was buried and He rose again the third day for our justification.1
·         Faith in Christ’s redemptive work on Calvary which results in repentance is the beginning of a true Christian life.  The fruits of repentance are a humble and contrite heart, prayer, godly sorrow, confession to God in the presence of man, forsaking of all sin, restitution and a forgiving spirit.1
·         Those newborn lambs need to become firmly grounded upon the Lord Jesus Christ through repentance and a true conversion, to surrender all ties to sin and worldliness, and to develop a true zeal to obey the teachings of the Word of God.2
·         Converts and brethren should refrain from being a participant or spectator at organized, competitive sporting events. 2,3
·         Converts and brethren should remove the harmful influence of television and other forms of unwholesome entertainment from their lives and homes. 2,3
·         Converts and brethren should practice patterns of modesty and restraint in their outward appearance, as a reflection of the true graces of humility and godliness in their hearts.  Both men and women should refrain from wearing scanty attire and should select clothing for their daily walk of life which reflects their gender. 2,3
·         Women should willingly adhere to scriptural teachings regarding long hair which is modestly arranged as well as the wearing of the head covering, all in accord with accepted church practices. 2,3
·         Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many.4  Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood to declare his righteousness for the remissions of sins that are past.5
·         A believer can sin but does not have to sin.
·         We do not believe in eternal security – once saved, always saved.6
·         There are faults and shortcomings which are not sin.
·         If a believer sins, discipline and the intercession of Christ can provide forgiveness, but for sins unto death there can be no full restoration.  Discipline of erring members is administered for their spiritual welfare and for the preservation of the church.1
·         Preaching should be by the inspiration of the spirit.3
·         Teaching and preaching must be based on the truth of the Word of God as presented in the King James version of the Bible.3
·         We should use the language of the authorized King James version of the Bible in addressing the Lord as ‘Thee’ and ‘Thou’ in our prayers.3
·         Funerals, weddings, and receptions should be conducted in a Godly manner.
·         We should not become involved in outside religious activities such as Bible Study Fellowship, Promise Keepers, etc., as well as unnecessary attendance at other religious services.3
·         We believe in practicing the long-standing traditions which have been such a benefit to our church.
·         This is not an inclusive list but contains many of our key beliefs

We met recently to begin the formation of a group of believers who desire to preserve the true faith.  A list of those things that we have moved us to at this point would contain the opposite of most of the items in the above list.  We are not soliciting brethren to join in this effort but we stand open to anyone who is Spirit-led to join it.  We have written this document because we desire to be open in regard to our efforts.

Finally, we are being told that what we are undertaking will cause divisions and hard feelings, not only today but for years to come.  This will only come to pass if we disregard the scripture to each other as Christ loved us.  Instead we must manifest that love in the way we treat each other.  May God grant us grace to that end.

Brothers                Roy Koehl                    Art Nohl                      Dennis Warner
                                Lawrence Luthi                Gene Marti


References:  1) The Statement of Faith; 2) Statement of Counseling Converts; 3) Reaffirming our Unity as Ministers of the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ; 4) Hebrews 9:28; 5) Romans 3:25; 6) August 2003 United Summary of the Elder Body on the Atoning Blood of Christ and related topics.

Paper #3 Letter from PAC's to church leadership May 2009











Paper #4 - Document on Sin and the blood of Christ - June 2012

June 2012
Introduction

The Shed Blood of Christ and Sin
Issues surrounding the shed blood of Christ and sin probably date back to the time of the early church. The two issues (the blood and sin) are completely entwined and always need to be dealt with together.

In spite of all of the variations of views, there are basically two beliefs and resultant applications that are involved:

1. Christ’s blood coupled with His crucifixion, death and resurrection lay the foundation for an individual to become reborn and live an overcoming life. The child of God does not have to continue in sin and can live a sin‐free life. However, a child of God can fall into sin. The responsibility and accountability for living a sin‐free life rests with the child of God, but can only be accomplished by the grace of God and with God’s gifts, especially the Holy Spirit. If a child of God sins, forgiveness for that sin is accomplished in this life through discipline and the advocacy of Christ but is limited depending on the nature of sin.

2. Christ’s blood continues to be an atonement for sin in the life of a child of God. Even the smallest failings are considered sin and so the child of God continues to sin each day. A dependency on the blood of Christ to atone for ongoing sin places the act of God’s forgiveness on Christ’s blood and a dependency on God’s mercy. Since Christ’s blood knows no bounds the most serious and grievous sins can be forgiven. In this environment overcoming and separated life are not seen as essential.

Index

Issue
1. What is sin in the life of a child of God? (page 3)
2. Why is it essential to separate failings and shortcomings from sins? (page 3)
3. Does God expect us to continue in sin? (page 3)
4. What does the blood of Christ accomplish? (page 4)
5. How essential was the resurrection of Christ? (page 5)
6. Can a child of God sin? (page 6)
7. Are there different degrees and levels of sin? (page 6)
8. How does a child of God find forgiveness in this life if they sin? (page 7)
9. What difference does it make if some believe that the forgiveness of sin in a child of God’s life
comes about by the blood of Christ and others by Christ’s advocacy? (page 7)
10. Do I John 1:8‐10 and Romans 7:17, 20 indicate that we must sin as a child of God? (page 8)
11. Are there scriptures which indicate unconditionally that children of God cannot sin? (page 9)
12. Are some scriptures misinterpreted to make it appear that sin is prevalent in a child of God’s life? (page 9)
13. Does the child of God have a hope of heaven or an assurance of heaven? (page 10)
14. Are God’s children sad, downcast and wearing a frown because they are asked to overcome, to bring forth works/fruits and to just have a hope of heaven? (page 11)

1. What is sin in the life of a child of God?

Sin is a disobedience to God that extends beyond the failings and shortcomings of a child of God.

2. Why is it essential to separate failings and shortcomings from sins?

Item 3 following clearly points out God’s expectation that we not continue in sin. If every impure
thought no matter how brief; every surge of anger no matter how small; every misspoken word;
every fleeting thought of lust or envy; every good deed not done, were sin, we would have to
conclude that we continue to live in sin and are a sinner. How can we then reconcile that state with God’s direction that we continue not in sin?

A proof of this is that in many denominations members are called and call themselves sinners. The scriptures indicate that there can be imperfections that are not sin:

Heb 12:1
(1) …let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset us…

Eph 2:1
(1) And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins;

Mar 11:25
(25) And when ye stand praying, forgive, if ye have ought against any: that your Father also
which is in heaven may forgive you your trespasses.

Jas 1:15
(15) Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth
forth death. (We know that extreme lust can be sin Matt 5:28).

Rom 14:21
(21) whereby thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or is made weak.

1Co 11:30
(30) For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep.

1Pe 2:20
(20) For what glory is it, if, when ye be buffeted for your faults

3. Does God expect us to continue in sin?

No, the following scriptures give us clear direction:

Joh 5:14
(14) Afterward Jesus findeth him in the temple, and said unto him, Behold, thou art made whole:
sin no more…

Rom 6:1-2
(1) What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
(2) God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?

Rom 6:6
(6) Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed,
that henceforth we should not serve sin.

1Jn 3:6
(6) Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known
him.

4. What does the blood of Christ accomplish?

The death, shed blood and resurrection of Christ lay the foundation for a new man, a house of God to be created in man. Without a true repentance, conversion and baptism the above gifts of Christ will avail nothing.

The crucifixion and death of Christ accomplish the destruction of the old man of sin and occur
before the shed blood.

Rom 6:6
(6) Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed,
that henceforth we should not serve sin.

Rom 5:10
(10) For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much
more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.

The shed blood of Christ pays the price for past sins and having purged those sins justifies us before God with an imputed righteousness.

Rom 3:25
(25) Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his
righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;

Rom 5:9
(9) Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through
him.

Christ’s blood was shed once for the remission of sin and after that no longer acts as an atonement for the forgiveness of sins.

Rom 6:10
(10) For in that he died, he died unto sin once…

Heb 7:27
(27) …for this he did once, when he offered up himself.

Heb 9:28
(28) So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many…

Heb 6:4-6
(4) For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly
gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost,
(5) And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come,
(6) If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to
themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.

Heb 10:26-27
(26) For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth
no more sacrifice for sins,
(27) But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the
adversaries.

Heb 10:29
(29) Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath
trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he
was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?

5. How essential was the resurrection of Christ?

Very essential. Without it we would not have a new life in Christ.

1Co 15:19
(19) If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable.

1Co 15:17
(17) And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins.

Rom 5:10
(10) …being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.

Rom 6:4
(4) …that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also
should walk in newness of life.

An essential part of this new life is that we receive the Holy Spirit within a cleansed and purified
heart. With the Spirit of Christ our righteousness is no longer just imputed but it indwells us. This is a critical truth because the forward atoning blood belief would say that there can be no righteousness in us as all righteousness is only because of Christ’s shed blood.

The scripture says this:

1Jn 3:7
(7) Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is
righteous.

1Jn 2:29
(29) …ye know that every one that doeth righteousness is born of him.

Php 1:11
(11) Being filled with the fruits of righteousness…

1Pe 2:24
(24) …that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were
healed.

6. Can a child of God sin?

Yes. By carelessness, failing to seek the Word of God, looking back to the former life and not
heeding the Spirit of God and the conscience—sin is possible.

1Jn 2:1
(1) ...if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous:

John writes “if” not “when” and “any man” not “all of us “ or “everyone.”

1Co 5:1
(1) It is reported commonly that there is fornication among you, and such fornication as is not so
much as named among the Gentiles, that one should have his father's wife.

2Co 12:21
(21) and that I shall bewail many which have sinned already…

7. Are there different degrees or levels of sin?

Yes.

1Jn 5:16
(16) If any man see his brother sin a sin which is not unto death, he shall ask, and he shall give
him life for them that sin not unto death. There is a sin unto death: I do not say that he shall pray
for it.

Jesus speaking to Pilate:

Joh 19:11
(11) Jesus answered, Thou couldest have no power at all against me, except it were given thee
from above: therefore he that delivered me unto thee hath the greater sin.

The difference between the sins of theft and adultery:

Pro 6:30-33
(30) Men do not despise a thief, if he steal to satisfy his soul when he is hungry;
(31) But if he be found, he shall restore sevenfold; he shall give all the substance of his house.
(32) But whoso committeth adultery with a woman lacketh understanding: he that doeth it
destroyeth his own soul.
(33) A wound and dishonour shall he get; and his reproach shall not be wiped away.
Faults, presumptuous sins, and the great transgression:

Psa 19:12-13
 (12) Who can understand his errors? cleanse thou me from secret faults.
(13) Keep back thy servant also from presumptuous sins; let them not have dominion over me:
then shall I be upright, and I shall be innocent from the great transgression.

There is also a difference between willful sin and a sudden fall into sin under certain circumstances. The church has long considered age, mental and physical conditions and certain circumstances when viewing the degree of sin.

8. How does a child of God find forgiveness in this life if they sin?

Forgiveness of sins up to a certain point is wrought by an acknowledging of sin, confession, sorrow and remorse, discipline and the advocacy of Christ to the Father.

1Jn 2:1
(1) My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have
an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous:

Heb 9:24
(24) For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the
true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us:

Heb 7:25
(25) Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing
he ever liveth to make intercession for them.

Christ will not intercede for sins unto death for by their very definition they remain a sin unto the time of death.

1Co 5:5
(5) To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved
in the day of the Lord Jesus.

Obviously there is no advocacy of Christ to the Father in this situation.

9. What difference does it make if some believe that the forgiveness of sin in a child of God’s life comes about by the blood of Christ and others by Christ’s advocacy?

The differences are significant.

Those that believe that the power of the shed blood of Christ to forgive sins is unconditional within the life of a child of God (with the possible exception of blasphemy and outright apostasy) begin to blur the distinction between types of sin and in their minds all sin becomes the same (e.g., an evil thought is the same as adultery). Discipline is deemed unnecessary where forgiveness is automatic and sweeping. With the supposed “safety net” of Christ’s blood forgiving us for our sins, a careless and casual lifestyle emerges.

Churches that take this path begin by promising to hold on to the tenants of worldly separation,
modest life style and an overcoming life. The fruits of the efforts speak for themselves.

On the other hand, those that believe in Christ’s advocacy for the forgiveness of sins believe that it is conditional and that it also has a limit and that Christ will only advocate for those who are completely broken and regretful for sin. Those who believe in Christ’s advocacy not only accept but desire discipline and will flee from further sin and return in the fullest possible measure to the church. They also believe that Christ will not advocate for sins unto death.

Churches who espouse the belief in Christ’s advocacy and discipline tend to maintain an overcoming life and a separation from the world. They also maintain an overcoming walk and a desire for carefulness.

10. Do I John 1:810 and Romans 7:17,20 indicate that we must sin as a child of God?

No.

1Jn 1:8-10
(8) If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
(9) If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all
unrighteousness.
(10) If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.

There are no contradictions in God’s Word. The same author, John, wrote in the same book:

1Jn 3:6
(6) Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not…

1Jn 3:9
(9) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot
sin, because he is born of God.

The only way that the scripture can be reconciled is that I John 1:8‐10 applies to those who are
unconverted. Even though the Epistle of John is written to children of God, there is nothing contrary about his reminding them of their former lives.

In Romans 7 that same contradiction seems to appear when the Apostle Paul says in verse 17:

Rom 7:17
(17) Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.

and again in verse 20:

Rom 7:20
(20) Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.

This is the same Apostle Paul who wrote in the preceding chapter:

Rom 6:1-2
(1) What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
(2) God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?

Again the only way to reconcile this is that the Apostle is speaking of his former life. Throughout the New Testament there is a mixture of direction to the converted and reminders of the unconverted state.

11. Are there scriptures which indicate unconditionally that children of God cannot sin.

No. Examples follow:

1Jn 3:6
(6) Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not...

The condition is that we abide in Him. If we abide in Him in the most full and complete measure we will not sin. If we fail to abide in Him in every aspect of our life we could fall into sin.

1Jn 3:9
(9) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot
sin, because he is born of God.

Here there are two conditions: first that a soul is truly born of God and second that His (God’s) seed remains in him. If we experience a true rebirth and baptism and then let the Holy Spirit work within us fully, we will not have to sin.

12. Are some scriptures misinterpreted to make it appear that sin is prevalent in a child of God’s life?

Yes. Examples follow:

(a)

1Jn 5:17
(17) All unrighteousness is sin…

Some would portray unrighteousness as the very smallest shortcomings and accordingly our lives are fraught with sin. Unrighteousness is in truth a description of gross and serious sin.

Rom 1:18
(18) For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness
of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;

The rest of the chapter describes all manner of grievous sin.

Rom 2:8-9
(8) But unto them that are contentious, and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness,
indignation and wrath,
 (9) Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil…

Serious enough sins to call for God’s tribulation and anguish.

2Co 6:14
(14) …for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath
light with darkness?

So serious that there would not be any fellowship.

And so, I John 5:17 is true, “all unrighteousness is sin,” with unrighteousness being gross and serious violations against God.

(b)

Jas 4:17
(17) Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin.

Not doing good is interpreted, by some, to mean a failure in doing good works; hence each time we fail in visiting a widow, for example, we sin. However, John 5:29 speaks of those who have “done good.” He uses past tense since He is speaking of those that have died and will be resurrected.

Joh 5:29
(29) And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that
have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.

Hence those who “do good” are those who have repented, are converted, have lived a sanctified life, and will be resurrected to heaven. For the unconverted person to know this and not partake, it is sin.

(c)

Rev 12:11
(11) And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and
they loved not their lives unto the death.

Some would say from this scripture that it is the ongoing blood of the Lamb that helps overcome
temptation. This scripture does not address when the blood of the Lamb was applied to help God’s children overcome temptation. It is Christ’s blood at the time of conversion, that allows souls to receive the gift of grace and the Holy Spirit. These gifts and tools of God allow His children to overcome temptation.

13. Does the child of God have a hope of heaven or an assurance of heaven?

Some would view hope as a weakness in God’s plan. After all, if we have been born again and have obtained the powerful gifts of God why would we only have a hope of heaven? The question is raised as a point of this discussion because the belief that the ongoing atonement of Christ’s blood solves the problem and provides a surety for heaven.

But what does the scripture say:

1Pe 4:18
(18) And if the righteous scarcely be saved, where shall the ungodly and the sinner appear?

Php 2:12
(12) Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now
much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.

Tit 3:7
(7) That being justified by his grace, we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternal
life.

Heb 6:11
(11) And we desire that every one of you do shew the same diligence to the full assurance of
hope unto the end:

Heb 6:19
(19) Which hope we have as an anchor of the soul, both sure and stedfast, and which entereth
into that within the veil;

And so the Word describes hope in the life of the child of God not as a weakness or a description of souls overwrought and in despair, but as an “anchor of the soul, both sure and steadfast.” Assurance of heaven is a part of the doctrine of “once saved, always saved.”

14. Are God’s children sad, downcast and wearing a frown because they are asked to overcome, to bring forth works/fruits and to just have a hope of heaven?

Absolutely not. The same scripture which calls for overcoming, bringing forth works, and the hope of eternal life, also describes the joy in laboring thus.

Act 13:52
(52) And the disciples were filled with joy, and with the Holy Ghost.

The disciples after being persecuted by the Jews.

Act 20:24
(24) But none of these things move me, neither count I my life dear unto myself, so that I might
finish my course with joy, and the ministry, which I have received of the Lord Jesus, to testify the
gospel of the grace of God.

The Apostle Paul after suffering so much in his life for his labors.

Jas 1:2
(2) My brethren, count it all joy when ye fall into divers temptations; Joy, even in trials.

1Pe 1:8-9
(8) Whom having not seen, ye love; in whom, though now ye see him not, yet believing, ye
rejoice with joy unspeakable and full of glory: (9) Receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls.

And many more scriptures could be quoted. A parallel and like experience of God’s children today in the church.


Paper #5 Document on Hebrews

Hebrews

The book of Hebrews has always been a stone of stumbling and rock of offense for those who have accepted another gospel.  Martin Luther, the champion of the “faith alone” gospel, very bluntly expressed his disapproval right in his preface to the epistle: 

“Again, there is a hard knot in the fact that in chapter six and ten it flatly denies and forbids to sinners repentance after baptism.  And in chapter twelve it says that Esau sought repentance and did not find it.  This seems, as it stands, to be against all the Gospels and Saint Paul’s epistles.  And although one might make a gloss on it, the words are so clear that I do not know whether that would be sufficient.  My opinion is that it is an epistle of many pieces put together, and it does not deal with any one subject in an orderly way.”[i]
Few people would possess the audacity of Luther to so haughtily dismiss a portion of Scripture, and therefore must try their hand at “making a gloss on it.”  One popular maneuver is to reduce the relevance of the warnings against apostasy to the Jewish Christians only, who were reverting back to the old law in the face of persecution.  With this understanding, one deceives himself that he has not fallen away as long as he trusts in Christ’s blood and does not return to the Levitical sacrifices.

Two Conflicting Views of Salvation

Our approach to the book of Hebrews will differ tremendously depending on the doctrinal foundation that we have embraced.  Presented below are two conflicting views of salvation:

1.      Man will forever be a depraved creature who is unable to satisfy the law and demands of a holy God, and therefore must depend alone on the merits of Christ and His atoning blood for salvation.
2.      Through the death, shed blood, and resurrection of Christ, man can be redeemed from Adam’s fall, partake of the divine nature, and live an overcoming life through the power of God’s indwelling Spirit.

If we have embraced the first view, then we need to understand that we have placed our trust in the theology of men such as Augustine, Martin Luther and John Calvin, and not in the Bible.  The latter view, however, is the pure gospel of Christ, and provides a firm foundation upon which we can build our spiritual house.  The entire Word of God will resonate in our hearts, providing countless encouragements to faithfulness and good works, and numerous warnings against falling back into sin and worldliness.  As Luther’s disclaimers illustrate, a false understanding of salvation will require us to pit the Bible against itself and explain away Scriptures that don’t fit our doctrine.

What the Law Could Not Do

It is important for us to understand why the epistle to the Hebrews, as well as Paul’s letter to the Galatians, contain such severe warnings against returning to the Judaic law.  It is not that God no longer requires works of obedience, or that He simply wished to relieve us of the expenditure of energy and resources needed to bring an animal sacrifice.  Much rather, the urgent admonitions of the Apostle stem from the fact that the law cannot deliver man from sin.  We read this very clearly in Romans 7, and succinctly in verse three of chapter eight: For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh.

This same description of the law’s deficiencies is also communicated in Hebrews:

For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof.  For the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did; by the which we draw nigh unto God.  (Hebrews 7:18-19)

For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect.  For then would they not have ceased to be offered? because that the worshippers once purged should have had no more conscience of sins.  But in those sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of sins every year.  For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.  (Hebrews 10:1-4)
In the book of Leviticus, we can read of God’s willingness to impart forgiveness when the priest offered an animal sacrifice for sin.  What was lacking, however, was the purging of sin from the hearts and minds of the people.  They could never be cleansed from the indwelling sin of Adam and become a new creature, therefore the fruits of unrighteousness were destined to reappear throughout the course of their natural life.  This is why the blood of bulls and goats could never take away sin.

A New and Living Way

On the other hand, God has provided the baptism of faith for entrance into the new covenant.
Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and our bodies washed with pure water.  (Hebrews 10:22)

The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:  (I Peter 3:21)
Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.  (Acts 2:38)

And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord.  (Acts 22:16)

And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth.  Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood,  (Revelation 1:5)

“O blissful hour and holy,
 When in God’s cov’nant truly
Through Christ’s blood I did pass.
There was I blest forever,
From Satan’s realm was severed,
Then when I took that holy bath.”
(Zion's Harp 222, verse 1)

“As immersed, as immersed
In the water and the blood
In the grave with Christ, the Saviour
In baptism’s cleansing flood,
Free from wrath with God in favor,
Dead to sin and self, which buried lies,
I arise, I arise.”
(Zion's Harp 23, verse 2)

As the blood and water flowed together from Christ’s wounded side, so these two agents unite in the cleansing flood of baptism for the soul who has repented and believed the Gospel.  This answer of a good conscience is the result of a cleansed heart, and prepares us for divine service in a way which was impossible under the law.  Instead of the continual offering and sacrifice for sin, we are cleansed once through Christ’s blood and raised to a new life through the power of His resurrection.

The Full Power of the Blood

Those who believe that the blood of Christ covers past, present, and future sins claim that we are diminishing the power of His blood if we do not believe that we may continually apply it for the forgiveness of sin.  In reality, the opposite is true.  They diminish the power of Christ’s blood who never actually become cleansed, but repeatedly call upon the blood, and remain (as they confess) as sinners.  This is not any improvement from the old law, and makes Christ the minister of sin.  Furthermore, it denies the power of God to fully redeem us from Adam’s fall and make us free from sin.  The blood of Christ cleanses us from all sin through faith and baptism into Christ’s death.  As we read in verse ten of the tenth chapter in Hebrews: By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.  It is then our duty, by the grace of God, to preserve our salvation and keep our garment clean.

Many will quote Hebrews 9:22 as proof that believers continually need to make use of Christ’s blood for forgiveness, but the first half of the verse is often omitted.  In entirety, the verse reads: And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.  This reference to the law reveals a great irony in this doctrinal battle.  When we are exhorted to work out our salvation in fear and trembling, purify ourselves, and live soberly, righteously, and Godly (direct New Testament teachings), there is much fuss and protest that we are going back to the old law.  Yet in regards to sin, these same individuals eagerly place us back under the law.  They claim every trespass and failing in the life of a sincere believer as proof that we continue to sin against God’s law, who according to His holiness could not forgive us if He did not again apply the blood of His Son.

Discerning Sin

It is disturbing to observe that while we are judging sin very harshly according to theology (every sin requires death and blood, they say), we are becoming more and more lenient with sin in practice.  Souls who have not been truly converted and therefore cannot overcome habitual sin are provided (according to the tradition of the world) professional counseling and coursework.  Discipline has mostly been reduced in application to souls who have already met with shipwreck and serious, gross sin.  Meanwhile, we are being asked to tolerate more and more disobedience, blatant worldliness, rebellion, and false doctrine.  We must understand that we do not honor God through theological statements about His holiness, but we honor Him through obedience to His Word which asks us to be holy as He is holy.  As we, as a church, become more and more worldly, God’s name is being profaned among a confused and disoriented nation.  If people do not see that our Christ provides us victory over sin and the world, they soon conclude that we possess nothing superior to other world religions and philosophies.

In addition, the theology that claims that we are unable to satisfy God’s law and that He would have to punish us with death for any sin were it not for the blood of Christ, contradicts at least three New Testament teachings:

1.  We are not under the law, but under grace.

For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.  What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace?  God forbid.  (Romans 6:14-15)

2.  We are indeed able to fulfill the righteousness, purpose, and intent of the law through the risen life of Christ.

That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.  (Romans 8:4)

Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.  (Romans 13:10)

3.  The New Testament is very clear that there is a difference in sin.  Not every sin is a sin unto death.
If any man see his brother sin a sin which is not unto death, he shall ask, and he shall give him life for them that sin not unto death.  There is a sin unto death: I do not say that he shall pray for it.  All unrighteousness is sin: and there is a sin not unto death.  (I John 5:16-17)

Brother Froehlich lamented the condition of those who were unable to discern the difference in sin:

“Therefore, an upright person who faithfully follows the motivation of the Spirit need have no fear of a sin unto death, even though there should perhaps be a deviating from the standard, for every deviation, though it be a sin, is, of course, not a sin unto death which would have to be atoned for by blood or be punished by death.  Then prayer and intercession is advocated.  This distinction can they not make who always appeal to Christ’s death, Who died only for sins committed in the time of ignorance and unbelief.  Either they have never had His life or they have lost it again.”[ii] 
In an exhortation delivered over twenty years ago, a dear elder brother expressed himself in like manner:

“Some say all sin is the same, regardless of what you do.  Then we should be excommunicated if you believe all sin is the same.  Because the Word teaches us where we should be excommunicated for certain sins, and if you want to put it all in the same pot, then we need to be excommunicated…  The Scripture does not lump grievous sin, unrighteousness, faults, trespasses, imperfections together; it makes many distinctions.  Only man, in order to explain his doctrine that he has taken unto himself, that he wants to apply to his life, that he may live according to his own selfish will, and not according to the divine command of God…Man has lumped it all together.  It makes it easier to support the doctrine ‘once saved, always saved’.”[iii]
Falling Back Into Sin

This inability to recognize a difference in sin is a fruit of false doctrine and deception, and explains why false Christians find the Scriptures in Hebrews 6 and 10 so objectionable.

Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God, Of the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, and of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment.  And this will we do, if God permit.  For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.  For the earth which drinketh in the rain that cometh oft upon it, and bringeth forth herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receiveth blessing from God: But that which beareth thorns and briers is rejected, and is nigh unto cursing; whose end is to be burned.  (Hebrews 6:1-8)

This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them; And their sins and iniquities will I remember no more.  Now where remission of these is, there is no more offering for sin.  Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus, By a new and living way, which he hath consecrated for us, through the veil, that is to say, his flesh; And having an high priest over the house of God; Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and our bodies washed with pure water.  Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised;) And let us consider one another to provoke unto love and to good works: Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching.  For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.  He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses: Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?  For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord.  And again, The Lord shall judge his people. It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.  (Hebrews 10:16-31)

If we are not bent on twisting the Scriptures to justify ourselves, then these passages are not that difficult to understand.  To fall away is to fall away, and to sin willfully is to sin willfully.  It is really a reversal of the marvelous transformation that God worked in our hearts when He called us out of a life of sin and darkness.  In both chapters, the groundwork of the re-birth is laid before the stern warning to not forfeit this priceless gift is delivered.  There is also a vivid description in chapter 6 (verses 4-5), and sound instruction in chapter 10 (verses 23-25) as to the ways and means that God has provided for us to preserve our salvation.

According to our natural birth, we possess the nature to sin and to walk contrary to the will of God.  Our attempts to rectify this condition through the power of our will or any other means leave us empty, disappointed, and condemned before God.  Therefore a complete rebirth, the transformation of our mind and regeneration of our heart, is required to restore us to a right relationship with our Creator.  Through the Word, we are begotten of God in order that we may be born again of water and of the Spirit.  We become partakers of the divine nature and our whole being is permeated with the love of God, giving us the will and the power to keep His commandments and to live holy, sanctified lives that bring glory to our Father in heaven.  In addition, we receive the mind of Christ, Who loved righteousness and hated iniquity. Therefore, those who reduce repentance and faith to a mere change of mind and a mental exercise betray their shallow experience and lack of understanding.

Having found this precious pearl of great price, we are driven by the Spirit to grow in faith and make our calling and election sure.  Fervent prayer, watchfulness, and humility are necessary to resist the temptations of Satan and avoid the pitfalls of sin and deception.  This is why we find the instruction to exhort one another and not forsake the assembling of ourselves with faithful believers.  If we begin to become slothful and lukewarm, our ability to discern the spirits and resist evil will quickly diminish.  Our inner spiritual life will become weak and famished, or poisoned with the leaven of sin and strange doctrine, and Satan will regain control of our lives.

A falling away, therefore, is not describing the momentary stumbling of a sincere believer, but rather a progression of spiritual decadence and deception.  Because the death of Christ was necessary to break Satan’s hold on our old life and remove the curse of Adam, the soul who returns to a life of sin is in a most lamentable condition, for Christ will not be crucified again.  The Apostle Peter declares that such an individual would have been better off if he had never known the way of righteousness, than to again swallow his own vomit and return to the wallowing in the mire.  Similarly, the Lord Jesus warned us that if the cleansed heart is vacant and not filled with the new life of godliness and truth, then seven additional spirits of Satan will repossess that heart and bring about a great destruction.

If we understand the importance of faithfulness, the nature of deception, and the seriousness of falling from grace, we will be most appreciative for these potent warnings contained in the book of Hebrews.  They will help to instill in us a healthy measure of Godly fear and keep us far away from gross sin.  Those who claim that these Scriptures are only speaking of Jewish Christians who return to the Levitical sacrifices have reduced the relevance of these passages to nothing for the believer in present-day America.  What great blindness and hardness of heart!  Have we not seen numerous souls become deceived, embrace strange spirits, return to a life of sin, and yet continue to name the name of Christ?  If we cannot discern a falling away until a person tells us that they no longer trust in the blood of Christ and instead offer a bullock upon an altar of sacrifice, then we ourselves are deceived.  The Apostle Paul warned us of the consequences of accepting another Jesus, or receiving another gospel; therefore carnal and worldly “Christians” who “trust in the blood of Christ” are no better off than the Jews who trusted in circumcision.  Where there is not victory over sin, there Christ Himself is not present, and is put to an open shame.

It is exceedingly obvious that these warnings address falling back into sin, for the express reason that there remains no more sacrifice to atone for that sin or to redeem the soul who has brought upo
n himself the second death.  They are not an admonition to avoid using the wrong sacrificial method after we have already sinned.

Principles of Hebrews

We can now understand several things in regards to Christ’s sacrifice through the book of Hebrews:

1. Christ died only once for sin.
So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.  (Hebrews 9:28)

2. We are sanctified through this offering only once, not throughout life, and not at the end of life, but at the beginning of our spiritual life.

By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.  (Hebrews 10:10)

3. The death and blood of Christ is intended to put away sin, purge our conscience, and prepare us to serve God in newness of life.

How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God? (Hebrews 9:14)

For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.  (Hebrews 9:26)

4. The blood of Christ cannot be reapplied for souls who return to sin.

For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.  (Hebrews 10:26-27)

These principles provide wonderful encouragement for souls who have been born again and desire to live faithfully for God.  There is really no need to raise objection or explain away the Scriptures that don’t sit well with us.  In the case of unfortunate souls who have seriously sinned after baptism, we are much better off to consult passages such as I Corinthians 5 that deal with discipline and excommunication, than to stretch and twist the Scriptures with questionable theology.  May we humbly abide in the doctrine of Christ.



[i] Luther, “Preface to Hebrews” Works of Martin Luther, Vol. 6 (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1982) 476
[ii] Froehlich, Samuel Evidence (Apostolic Christian Publications, 1978) 126-127
[iii] Elder Bro. Don Sauder, minister meeting, 1986)

Paper #6 Document on Romans 7

ROMANS 7–THE LAW OF SIN AND DEATH

Sandwiched between chapters that beautifully relate the believer’s victory over sin, the seventh chapter of Romans has often proven to be a point of contention and confusion.  Indeed, many have concluded that Paul’s parenthetical illustration of natural man’s struggle with sin is describing the life of a converted child of God.  But this interpretation sharply contradicts both the preceding and subsequent chapters.  What was the apostle trying to communicate to us?

For a concise explanation of Romans 7, it’s difficult to improve upon that which Brother Don Sauder provided in a 1986 exhortation:

(Don Sauder, 1986) Some think Romans 7 indicates that Paul lived in sin.  That’s not true.  Romans 7 relates a war going on in the flesh of natural man, between sin and the law of God.  Natural man cannot fulfill the law of God; neither man’s human will, nor the desire of his mind can free him from the bondage of sin.  Paul’s message was simply: Christ alone can liberate man from the bondage of sin.  He had tried through natural means—the means, the desire of his mind, which he could harmonize with the law of God.  But the law of sin that was in his flesh—he couldn’t overcome it with the strength of his will or his mind.  And his message was simply that Christ alone can liberate man.  Christ came for that purpose (I John 3:8).

It’s helpful to first understand the analogy that Paul relates in the first four verses:

(Romans 7:1-4) Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth?  For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband.  So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man.  Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God.

Just as marriage binds a wife to her husband, the law of God binds man to his sin by revealing his lost and wretched condition.  Paul describes this process later in the chapter:

(Romans 7:9)  For I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died.

In other words, even though all mankind is born with a sinful nature, we pass our years of youth in innocence and are considered yet alive in the eyes of God.  One does not typically observe that children are pressed down and burdened by the weight and guilt of sin.  But when a soul reaches an age of understanding, or accountability, he discovers that he simply is not living up to the expectations of a holy God, and is separated from Him.  Before his eyes lies only a fiery judgment for all eternity, and a two-fold realization clinches his status of a poor, lost sinner:

1)            He can find no relief of guilt for the sins he has committed.
2)            Try as he may, he cannot break free from sin’s mighty hold on him

Thus, the law of God has bound him in his sin.  Several other passages in Romans relate this condition:

(Romans 3:19) Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.

(Romans 4:15) Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression.

(Romans 5:13) For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.

As in the case of marriage, death is required to terminate this union, otherwise the sin of adultery occurs.  Therefore, our old man of sin must die (Romans 6) in order for us to be joined to God through our Lord Jesus Christ.  With this introduction, Paul has established two distinct conditions which can be summarized in verses five and six:

1)            Natural man, walking in the flesh, married to the law of sin and death:

(Romans 7:5) For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sins, which were by the law, did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death.

2)            The new man, walking in the Spirit, married to Christ:

(Romans 7:6) But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter.

So, as we read the remaining verses in this chapter, we can acquire a correct understanding through the Spirit by asking this simple question: Is the Apostle Paul describing one who is married to the law of sin and death, or one who has died to sin and is married to Christ?

Though the answer should be quite obvious, perhaps souls become confused when it appears that Paul is speaking in the present tense:

(Romans 7:14-15) For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.  For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.

(Romans 7:19-20) For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.  Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Many erroneously conclude that the apostle is referring to his life as a believer in the Lord Jesus Christ, which is a great deception.  First of all, this fails the test that was presented earlier.  To be sold under sin is the same as being married to the law of sin and death, and if we are in such a state, we do not belong to Christ.  Secondly, we need only to back up a few verses to place these Scriptures in their proper context.  Paul is explaining the purpose of the law, which was not given to save man, but to alert him to the fact that he needs to be saved!  When we consider the immense amount of controversy that the Apostle encountered during this time of transition from the law to grace, it’s no wonder that he went to such great lengths to expound this matter.  He was not saying that the law was wrong, or that it had no purpose.  So he had to defend his position against the ever-indignant Jews, while at the same time, place the law in its proper place and context: a means to create a hungering and thirsting after righteousness in the heart of man and point him to Christ.  Read these verses carefully:      
                                
(Romans 7:7-13) What shall we say then?  Is the law sin? God forbid.  Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.  But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence.  For without the law sin was dead.  For I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died.  And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death.  For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me.   Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.  Was then that which is good made death unto me?  God forbid.  But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.

The remaining verses, therefore, depict the depths of this inner struggle.  Brother Wayne Anliker put it this way:

(Wayne Anliker, July 4, 2004) In this state – not in the state of the believer that’s been baptized and is a faithful member of Christ’s body, and walking in the grace of God, being an overcomer, not talking about that at all – but back to that time when we felt the conviction of sin in our life . . .  For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do (v.19).  That’s a horrible dilemma!  That is a perfect description of our state when we were under conviction, and we began to repent.  It’s not the state of someone that’s not accountable, it’s not the state of someone that’s redeemed; it’s the state of that soul that is now under conviction by the law of God and by the Spirit of God.

A similar explanation was once given to a young convert, who then expressed appreciation for the guidance and  added, “I wasn’t sure what he was talking about there – I  just knew that whatever he was describing, it wasn’t working!”  Isn’t it beautiful how God can impart a measure of understanding to souls who are tender and desire to live for Him?  Once we simply conclude that “it wasn’t working” we can know of a surety that this is not relating the condition of grace and a new life in Christ.  Who would want to preach a gospel that doesn’t work, and instead leaves men in a miserable condition crying, ‘O wretched man that I am!’?

The only way for men to make their false interpretation “work” is to insert their exaggerated doctrine of imputation.  They teach that, yes, man must continue to live in this miserable, carnal state, but since he professes faith he will be saved in the end because Christ’s righteousness is imputed to him.  However, this is not a saving faith, but merely an adherence to a thought process and belief system.  It does not truly deliver man from sin.  The agony expressed in these verses is a crying out for a real, genuine Saviour, One who can break the power of Satan and redeem us from slavery and certain destruction.

Individuals who have been deceived into believing that they are saved without experiencing a true conversion will naturally find Romans 7 to be a description of their inner condition.  A grave error, therefore, occurs when men use their experience to interpret the Bible, rather than allowing God’s Word to shape their experience.  Brother Samuel Froehlich described this fallacy, which he evidently encountered in his time:

(S.H. Froehlich, Baptismal Truth, pages 186-190) No man can judge of all these things who has not been baptized in the true faith; and the judgment of such unbaptized, who have not experienced God’s power in themselves, can and dare not mean anything to us, for they speak of the matter as a blind man speaks of that which he has not seen.  When they say that a man must drag himself through this life with his inborn sin, and can neither become its master nor free himself from the old man, it is something founded in their experience, but we must not believe them for they say the opposite of that which is said in the Word of God.   Where do we ever hear one of these scribes speak the language of the apostles?  However, if they had the same spirit of faith, then they would also speak the same language and they would not subject the Word of the Spirit of God, which they do not understand, to their own miserable, exhausting, and false interpretations, in order to adapt it to their own fleshly mind.  If their experience tells them that they are still in the flesh and under sin, they turn that into a general rule, contrary to the Word of God and the mind of the Spirit and say that the Christian must, throughout his life, be carnal and a sold slave of sin.  He would do that which is good but he cannot and instead he must do the evil which he would not!  Thus they at least confess where they stand and what they are; and as the mouse enters the trap in order to eat the meat in it so God also catches these wise men in their falsely so-called knowledge (I Timothy 6:20-21; I Corinthians 3:19-23), for which they can, however, produce no divine but only a human guarantee.

True, they do seek in the passage before us (Romans 7:7-25) the divine guarantee of their false opinion and doctrine; but because they have fallen into the trap they do not notice that the Apostle Paul here describes partly the legal status in general, partly his special status under the law, while he was yet away from Christ, a pious Pharisee, who through the power of his old man would fulfil the righteousness of the law—(for he speaks of the law to which he had died in Christ)—and yet he accomplished nothing in it until he cried out: "O wretched man that I am, who shall deliver me from the body of this death?"  In answer to this earnest question, Christ then revealed Himself to him as his Redeemer; after that it was no longer necessary to ask who would deliver him out of his misery: on the contrary thereafter he thanked God for his redemption and commended it to all men, however, as vainly to the so-called Christians of the present time as to most of the Jews of his time.  The most honest among them also come to this point, to say "O wretched man that I am, who shall redeem me?"—and Jesus Christ will also reveal Himself to them in spirit as risen from the dead,that they thereafter might eat and drink with Him.  But the rest remain fast in the sandbank of their false comfort and faith in a dead Christ on which their leaky bark has run aground; of which dead Christ, however, Paul teaches that He lives (Acts 25:19).

Thus, all of so-called Christendom has and knows no other Christ than a dead one; but of the living Christ (Who would live in us through His promised Spirit of sanctification it knows nothing), who is the Head of the body, the Church.  Paul, as apostle, was so joyously conscious of his liberty and his blessed state of grace in the new creature, that he wished that all men were even as he in Jesus Christ save these bonds (Acts 26:29) although the scribes now would make him a sold slave of sin, yet he himself in Romans 6 and 8 testifies to the contrary.  Whoever finds in Romans 7:7 ff. a description of the state of grace proves that he himself is not under grace but under the law.

Jesus Christ came in the flesh to fulfill the law, satisfy our spiritual hunger and thirst, and release us from the bondage of sin.  As the second Adam, Christ succeeded in complete obedience to the Father’s will.  Where Adam’s failure brought death to all men, the Lord’s victory brought life and opened the way for salvation.  Faith in this beloved Saviour begins to dawn in verse 25, after the contrite soul has wrestled with sin, struggled through repentance, and cried to God for deliverance.
(Romans 7:24-25a) O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?  I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord.

The remaining portion of this verse, therefore, is not a picture of the victory through Christ, but rather, a reiteration of the condition that necessitates the Lord’s intervention and help.

(Romans 7:25b) So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.
The law could only reveal the presence of sin and create a desire to improve, but it lacked the power of accomplishment.  It’s another way of stating what the apostle described in verses 22-23.

(Romans 7:22-23) For I delight in the law of God after the inward man: But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.

All misunderstanding and false interpretation must vanish away as we proceed to chapter eight.  (Paul’s dissertation was written as a continuous letter, and not divided into chapters until many years later.)  Here, he articulates salvation in Christ, the victory over sin, and the spiritual walk.  It is a night and day contrast from serving sin in the flesh.

(Romans 8:1-10) There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.  For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.  For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh: That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.  For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit.  For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.  Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.  So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.  But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you.  Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.  And if Christ be in you, the body is dead because of sin; but the Spirit is life because of righteousness.

As believers in Christ, we can rejoice in this victory. Once again, Brother Don Sauder sums it up nicely:

(Don Sauder, 1986) False prophets teach today that there are many christs.  They want to tell us (and this is particularly true in the New Age movement) – they want to get man to thinking that there are many christs; they want to minimize Christ our Lord.  So they say Moses was a christ, Mohammed was a christ, Buddha was a christ, and so on and so on.  But the only true Christ is mentioned in Luke 9:20—the Christ of God—the Christ that we know.  Only in the true Christ is the power to liberate man from sin.  If they want to call all these other men Christ, one thing they cannot do is convince a true believer that in the name of any of these other men is the power to liberate man from sin.  Now if we’re sinning daily, beloved, we just as well believe in Mohammed, we just as well believe in Buddha.  They don’t have the power to liberate man from sin—our Christ does!  He has that power, and if we don’t have that power, there’s something wrong with our spiritual life.  We are not living in the Spirit, we are not walking in the Spirit.  The Christ of God is the power to live a victorious life, to overcome sin, Satan, [the] world.  That is the power that we have in Christ Jesus.



Paper #7 from May 2012

5/1/2012

A History of the Transition from an Apostolic Believing
Church to a New Evangelical Church

Table of Contents

PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................. 3
An Apostolic Believing Church versus a New Evangelical Church................................................ 4
Apostolic Believing Church Principles ................................................................................................ 4
New Evangelical Church Principles....................................................................................................... 5
Where it All Starts: The Blood of Christ.............................................................................................. 5
What Follows: the Issue of Sin in the Life of a Church Member..................................................... 6
With Christ’s Blood Covering All Sin, Except Blasphemy, the Need for Discipline Vanishes .. 6
Continuance in Sin and its Forgiveness in Christ’s Blood Impacts Conversion ......................... 7
Surety Replaces Hope ........................................................................................................................... 7
Even the Smallest Failings become Sin .............................................................................................. 8
Faith Alone, Not Works ....................................................................................................................... 8
Apostolic Believers’ Lifestyles are Abandoned and a Return to Worldliness Ensues ............. 8
Long Hair and Head Coverings Diminish or Disappear .................................................................. 9
Leadership Ultimately Strengthens and Accelerates the Transition ............................................ 9
Names and Other Pressures .............................................................................................................. 11
Unity for the Sake of Unity ............................................................................................................... 11
The Promotion of Change as Inevitable.......................................................................................... 12
A Changing Ministry ........................................................................................................................ 12
Outreach Becomes Central A Departure from Separation ......................................................... 13
Additional Congregations are Established as Part of an Internal Missionary Process .......... 14
Denial – It’s Not Happening ............................................................................................................ 14
Transformation Completed ............................................................................................................... 15
What Happens to the Apostolic Believing Church Members? .................................................. 17
Reference Notes ................................................................................................................................. 18


PREFACE
The following document is a compilation of historical facts and accounts regarding the transition of
conservative Christian groups from one set of beliefs to another. Its purpose is to research and record how
believers were influenced over time to discard their original set of beliefs and adopt a different doctrine.
Two terms are used repeatedly in this writing: 1) Apostolic Believing church which indicates a group
embracing a doctrine similar to the Apostles and Early Church Fathers, and 2) New Evangelical church which is defined as a group embodying the Calvinistic doctrines as described on page five of this document and referenced in Winds of Doctrine, published in 1986 by the Apostolic Christian Church of America.
The document traces the transition from an Apostolic Believing church into a New Evangelical church during the 1900’s. Several sources were consulted, including interviews and written records from the Froehlich lineage Swiss and German Apostolic Christian Churches, information from the Apostolic Christian Church of America (Nazarene), historical documentations from the Mennonites, and a book entitled Becoming a Missionary Church by Bernhard Ott, the president of the ETG church in Switzerland. (Reference last page of this document for further details about the sources used.)
The material presented here is only a glimpse of how the change occurred. It is not intended to be an
exhaustive documentation of all the details of the transition, but rather to highlight some of the key elements in the move from godliness to worldliness. Sometimes the transition took over a century, but other
transitions were accomplished in much less time, such as the 35 years it took for the Swiss churches to
become unrecognizable when compared to their original presence. Despite variations in the length of
transition time or the location of the churches, a startling discovery emerges. The chain of events that
occurred and attitudes of the change agents are strikingly similar in all groups.
Since a complete transition of church doctrine can take long periods of time, often the change takes place in
very small steps and is nearly imperceptible. Coupled with the fact that many various methods are used to
promote change, the transition can be very difficult for many people to recognize. Many awaken when it is
too late and they wonder, “How did we get here?”
Please be apprised that this writing does not indicate in any way that all change is bad or is to be avoided.
Much to the contrary, we recognize that a conversion of a soul from a life of sin to a state of holiness involves a great change. And as we strive to live a converted life, we endeavor to change to become more conformed to the image of Christ. Life itself is a series of changes. However, changing from Biblical purity to impurity is to be strongly resisted by the true believer.
An understanding of history can give us a glimpse into the future. As the reader of this document ponders its content, may God reveal its application in our time. May God bless the brothers from various different Apostolic Christian Churches who assisted with this work.

Kurt W. Ehnle
April, 2012


An Apostolic Believing Church versus a New Evangelical Church
In this historic analysis, the description of a New Evangelical church is not intended to describe a New
Evangelical church at any given point in time, but rather to describe evangelical principals which go far back in time. ‘Lifestyle’ as used in this document refers to the outward manifestation demonstrated by Apostolic Believing church members. Also, the use of italics in this document indicates a direct quote from the footnoted source.

Apostolic Believing Church Principles
The shed blood of Christ pays the price once for a person’s sins.1
Membership in the church comes about through a repentance (sorrow for sin); a conversion (dying to a
sinful nature); forgiveness of sin through faith in the blood of Christ; and baptism after experiencing
peace.2
Members experience failings and shortcomings in their life of faith.3
Members, by the grace of God, strive to walk a life free from sin4.
Sins are not all the same. If a member sins a sin of a lesser nature, forgiveness is provided through
discipline and the intercession of Christ to God5.
For sins of a grievous nature, there is no church restoration.6
Members are Spiritled and consequently separate themselves from worldly involvement in all aspects of
their life, including entertainment, immodest appearance, and so forth.7
There is a belief in the living hope of heaven and not the unconditional surety of heaven8.
Members separate themselves from ecumenical involvement and give anonymously and without
fanfare9.
Spiritual outreach in an Apostolic Believing church involves a full and complete process including
preaching the gospel, assisting in the conversion process and providing a lifelong shepherding10.

New Evangelical Church Principles11
The Evangelical Movement is more openminded, intellectual, and of broader scope in order to make it
more acceptable to more highly educated people and more compatible with popular, individualistic
lifestyles.
Shallow concept of conversion. [This doctrine implies that even after “justification” a believer is
considered a “saved sinner” and lifestyle is unimportant because of Christ’s atonement for all sin: past,
present, and future.12]
Diminished importance of the Church.
Tolerance of doctrinal variance. Denominational borders are readily crossed, usually without regard
for significant doctrinal differences.
Casual attitude toward sanctification and sin. There is a marked deemphasis on works and serious
efforts to aspire to holiness in living. The church is defined as a “divinely created fellowship of sinners”
or “Christians aren’t perfect, just forgiven.” The belief is that Christians are sinning daily just like the
unconverted.
Great emphasis is placed on scholarship (serious formal study) and intellectualism.
Christian liberty is defined as individual freedom in most areas of lifestyle not specifically forbidden in
the Word. This individualism takes precedence over responsibility to church standards or the
convictions of other members of a church body. Every believer feels he can adequately discern the Spirit
and interprets the Word for himself and has the liberty to apply it to any circumstance as he sees fit.
Christian liberty is also defined as including freedom from observance of specific norms of holiness or
agreed upon church guidelines for application of scriptural teachings. This often results in a freer and
more worldly lifestyle. Efforts to observe holiness in living and to follow churchdefined standards of
godliness based on the Word are criticized as “legalism” or following rules to “earn salvation.”
The influences of evangelicalism have undermined confidence in the ordained to “bind or loose”
(Matthew 16:19) and have overemphasized the rights of the individual when it comes to discipline.

Where it All Starts: The Blood of Christ
There has always been a debate whether the evangelical transition begins with a change in doctrine regarding Christ’s blood and then lifestyle changes follow, or whether lifestyles change and a different doctrine evolves to match the lifestyle. Regardless of which comes first, both doctrine and lifestyles change in the transition.
The Apostolic Believing church believes that Christ shed His blood once for the atonement of sins. The New
Evangelical church believes that Christ’s blood pays the price for past, present, and future sins.13
In the transition process, this change in belief is introduced by ministers using the past, present, and future
terminology in sermons. Official church documents are changed to state that the blood of Christ cleanses
members when they sin, thus promoting the present and future cleansing by the blood of Christ.


What Follows: the Issue of Sin in the Life of a Church Member
The Apostolic Believing church believes that a church member can sin but if they use all of God’s gifts they do not have to sin. The New Evangelical church believes that its members continue to sin on an everyday basis.
In the transition, the concept of continuing to sin is introduced slowly into the church body. Samuel
Froehlich, instrumental in the formation of the Swiss and German Apostolic churches in Europe, writes of
several subtleties he experienced in this process. In I John 2:1 “And if any man sin” is changed to when any
man sins. Samuel Froehlich spoke about this change, “John indeed admits the possibility of a sin in a believer’s life, but with such restriction that nothing can be said of it as being a general rule or necessity. The restriction of sin is twofold:

(a) “if even” (in cases it should happen, that )
(b) “perhaps one” (not everyone or “we”)14

Samuel Froehlich was also confronted with the application of I John 1:810 as applying to a believer’s life. He wrote, “Verses 8‐10 serve only as elucidation (clarification), how one may attain unto the cleansing of his former sins and unto fellowship with God.”15
Samuel Froehlich also addressed the evangelical belief that Romans 7 describes the sinful nature of the
Apostle Paul as a believer. “John by verse 8 (I John 1:8), therefore refers just as much to an earlier condition as Paul does in Romans 7, in that he describes the way of the beginning of conversion…”16
The history of using these scriptures, and others, to prove sin in the life of a church member continue on into more modern times. It also reveals an ongoing pressure to acknowledge sin in an Apostolic Believing church member’s life.

With Christ’s Blood Covering All Sin, Except Blasphemy, the Need for
Discipline Vanishes
The Apostolic Believing church has a long history of discipline, ranging from self‐discipline to
excommunication without restoration. In the history of evangelical transitions, fewer and fewer sins are
disciplined for and the restoration of church members for sin becomes automatic. Church members are restored quickly for even very serious sins.17
The attitude of young people toward discipline in one transitional church was stated as follows: “It became
more and more difficult to integrate the youth of the 20th Century into a separated fellowship. The enforcement of church discipline among the youth had to be mostly abandoned to prevent major defections.”18 When we no longer agree on the sinfulness of sin, it will be but a short time until we disagree on the necessity of the atonement for sin and will also be ready to do away with a place of punishment for sin.”19
At the end of an evangelical transition, one church simply stated their belief in discipline: “Congregational
discipline is not practiced anymore.”20

Continuance in Sin and its Forgiveness in Christ’s Blood Impacts Conversion
History records the evangelical transition from a deep and impactful conversion to a simple acknowledgement of Christ’s shed blood for sin. The Apostolic Believing church believes that the conversion process brings about a complete transformation in an individual. It becomes the point where the sin and carnality of a former life cease and a new Spirit‐led life begins. This dramatic change is reflected in the lifestyle of the one who is converted.21
“One reason for the problems we face in the Apostolic Believing churches today is we have not been as careful as we ought to have been when baptizing members into the body of Christ. No one should receive water baptism until there is full evidence of the new birth and true repentance and amendment of life. There must be a knowledge of the awful sinfulness of sin and true repentance when one has been following the dictates of the lusts of the flesh and the lusts of the eye. By the grace of God, he turns around and goes the other direction.”22
In the transition to a New Evangelical church, individuals begin to put less weight on the conversion process. Conversion becomes viewed more as an ongoing process and not as a significant one‐time event. There is an increasing unwillingness to give up the things of their former life. Depending on the shed blood of Christ for future forgiveness lessens the need to cease from worldly activities. Appearance and other lifestyle issues become irrelevant. At the end of the transition, the conversion process diminishes to an acceptance of Christ’s blood for the forgiveness of sins.23

Surety Replaces Hope
Eternal security is a relatively new term, but the concept extends far back into history. New Evangelical
church members believe that there is nothing that they can do, short of blasphemy and being apostate, that
will keep them from heaven. Again, the belief that the shed blood of Christ pays the price for present and future sins is foundational in believing in surety. In contrast, Apostolic Believing churches believe there is a hope of heaven and that church members could fall short.24 In the transition, evangelicals portray anyone who professes to live in hope as being downtrodden, sad, and laboring under an oppressive yoke.
The surety message begins to surface especially at funerals. Apostolic believers are very cautious about
“preaching anyone into heaven.” However, as the transition to evangelicalism progresses, the surety of someone who passes away attaining heaven becomes more dominant. Sermons and official church
documents begin to propagate this belief.

Even the Smallest Failings become Sin
There is a long standing historical Apostolic belief that before sin occurs there can be failings or shortcomings in the life of a church member. In the transition, the evangelical position surfaces that even the smallest failing is sin and that to not call it sin diminishes the seriousness of sin. As this belief progresses, all sin becomes viewed as being the same. History reveals that this attitude toward sin slowly but surely opens the way to a freer lifestyle and a new, diminished concern about more serious sin25.

Faith Alone, Not Works
‘Faith alone’ has roots that run deep into religious history. Before an evangelical transition begins, Apostolic Believing churches believe in works accompanied by faith26. They also believe that works will play a role in an individual’s eternal judgment. As the transition develops, a message of works as being legalistic or part of the Old Testament law surfaces. History shows, however, that the works being challenged are not works associated with outreach or the good works in communities. Works become the lifestyle issues of outward appearance, abstinence from worldly influences, and the living of a separated life. At transition’s end, the lifestyle “works” are no longer a part of the church’s tenets but are left to each individual.

Apostolic Believers’ Lifestyles are Abandoned and a Return to Worldliness
Ensues
As the evangelical transition progresses, church members return to the lifestyles of the unconverted life.
Members in good standing attend movies, smoke, drink, attend and play in sporting events, wear jewelry
(including wedding bands)27, have television in their homes, 28 and become immodest in dress (such as wearing shorts and clothing of the opposite sex).29 In fundamentalist congregations, television was recognized for its harmful influence in the 1940’s while it was still in the developmental stage. Members began to secretly watch TV in attics and basements. By the 1960’s, TV was widely in use.30
We are all being asked to work along and not be so unkind as to contest these unscriptural practices, (in the above paragraph), with the assertion that to do so is divisive and that all division is sin. Those who dare to contest these trends are publicly classed by conference leaders as offenders along with the worst of the liberals and are accused of being divisive. The fact that these accusations are coming from brethren with whom we labored earnestly in days and years past is not without serious significance.31 Any challenge to indecency and immodesty is interpreted as an imposition and is called stubbornness and rebellion.”32
At the end of the transition, one evangelical church describes their view of lifestyle issues: “The edicts, which were obligatory under the name of “separation,” are no longer taught. Proper behavior within society is left to the responsibility of each individual believer.”33

Long Hair and Head Coverings Diminish or Disappear
“Apostolic believers believe that it is a scriptural directive, contained in I Corinthians 1134, that women members have long, uncut hair and in addition have their head covered when they pray or prophesy. One of the early signs of an evangelical transition is the cutting of hair and the diminishment of head coverings both in frequency of use and their becoming less substantial.35 One denomination reported, “By the end of the 1950’s, conferences all across North America were accepting cut hair on women in the church.”36 At the transition’s completion, neither long hair nor headcoverings are an issue and the scriptural directives are lost37.

Leadership Ultimately Strengthens and Accelerates the Transition
Leadership in Apostolic Believing churches assumes a servant leadership role. Humility, the spirit of selfhumbling and self‐denial is a work of the Spirit in us. The exalted spirits only instigate discord; they desire to rule. Such have no place in the church of God. In the church there should be no rank, no craving for power, he who would be the greatest should be the servant of all. The spirit of ambition has wrought much harm in the church, there the minister is higher than the other people, the bishop higher than the minister, the archbishop higher than the bishop, and the pope is still higher. This is not true in the New Testament. What formerly was an overseer became a rank of honor. In the church there can be nothing else than that he would be greatest, must be the servant of all. In this spirit the church is built. We should have no other thoughts, of this kind, as though the elder in the church were higher. The elder, the deacon, is not higher; but they are brethren and stand, if possible, lower for they are servants, and so they must serve, and the servant is not higher than the church itself or than the master. If the elder of the church must seek after humility, how much more all the rest. All rank ceases if the elders of the church are lowly and meek. Then the others should think they are still lower. Thus Christ has, like all other men, in His body members that are different, otherwise they all serve one purpose in the church. Each one has received gifts for the common good, that the church of God may be built.38
“Historically, conferences were gatherings of the ministry of local congregations to discuss and decide matters of doctrine and practice. These conferences were usually held only when special needs arose. In time, conference grew into authoritative bodies, adopting conference discipline, directing conference activities and charities, and exercising power over local congregations and ministers. The practice of exercising conference authority intensified as time went on.39
In early conference histories, sound and able men provided leadership. They guided the church through their writings and preaching of the Scriptures and practical Biblical living.”40 As time went on, the evangelical leanings of an ever‐growing number of leaders began to have its impact. Apostolic Believing leaders retired, or grew older and tired, and leaders from a growing number of evangelical‐leaning churches were appointed until the leadership balance shifted. Some Apostolic Believing elders became evangelically minded.41
“Conference sessions began to include more and more concessions to modern thinking. Study committees were appointed, which found innovative ways to interpret the Scriptures so that those who wanted accommodations with the world could find conference approval. Clever arguments were used to condemn Apostolic believers as self‐willed, accusing, and complaining.42 Centralized organization in its advanced state tends to become hierarchical and oppressively coercive as power concentrates in the smaller groups of leaders, and individual personalities wield a greater influence. The tendency then is for this small group to centralize all control within itself with little or no regard for the group conscience as a whole.43
Conference leaders often used democratic methods to accomplish their purpose. If a church with an Apostolic Believing leadership experienced difficulty, the Executive Committee of Conference could come in against the wishes of the ministry. Oftentimes a majority of the congregation did not want this to happen.44 Conference authority over local churches tended to settle disputes according to the new course. While conference leaders used a variety of methods to gain their ends, a democratic method was often used. Able and articulate, they could often overcome the scruples of local leadership and impose a policy in keeping with the new direction the conferences were taking.”45
The greatest havoc has come to the church by men who have been lifted up in pride. Associated with the office of the bishop or overseer is the tendency to think that the office carries with it a monopoly on wisdom and ability. We should observe that the apostle Paul defines this office as a work, not as an honor, for bishops should look more to their work than to their honor.46 The true shepherd is one who gently leads his flock. The great mistake of some leaders is to try by sheer force of will to make others follow them. This is a disastrous course. Some have succeeded for a while because of buildup of church loyalty from a past generation, but ultimately this method fails.47“Leadership assumes control of official church publications. The publications are used to promote the evangelical agenda and provide church‐wide distribution to the church body. In time, Apostolic Believing members become distressed and desire the doctrine of the pure Word of God.48
Eventually, conference leadership begins to silence church members, ministers, and leaders who stand in the way of the transition.”49 This is done through intimidation, discipline, and removal from church offices. The commonly used charges are “sowing seeds of discord”, “sedition”, and “heresy”. Many of us had hoped to see revival within the bounds of the present organizational pattern. But when honest pleas and concerns of many brethren go unheeded and when those who appeal are censured rather than heard, hope is quickly lost.50

Names and Other Pressures
In a transition, the portion of the church that desires to stay with the Apostolic Believing ways comes under
pressure. Interestingly, the evangelical portion of the church does not. This is probably because at some
point leadership is dominated by the evangelical influence.
In the beginning years of an Apostolic Believing church, male members are called Brothers and female
members, Sisters. As the transition progresses, at the point when differences become great enough, a new set of names and titles appear.
In more modern times, the terminology is “ultra‐conservative” for those who follow traditional fundamental ways; and then conservative, liberal, and ultra‐liberal, etc. In earlier times, the language for Apostolic believers was rigid, implacable, extreme, self‐righteous, and Pharisaical. These terms are also used in more modern times along with ultra‐conservative51. Other terms used are independent, self‐willed, accusing, and complaining conservatives.52
In addition, Apostolic believers are under pressure for not attending church functions they cannot support
and for the stand they take in preserving long‐standing doctrine and practices. Worst of all, the voices of
those with concerns receive little or no recognition; rather, these voices are immediately pushed aside as being uncooperative and lacking love.53

Unity for the Sake of Unity
As the transition progresses, unity begins to emerge as a critical objective. Apostolic believers believe that unity is scripturally based and means a oneness of doctrinal belief, thought, conversation, spirit, sanctified life, and lifestyle54. The basis of true unity, then, is a personal relationship of faith and obedience to Christ through the Spirit and with our brethren in the body of Christ.55 For the transition to succeed in an ever‐divided church, unity becomes the acceptance and tolerance of differences. There is an adamant denial of compromise. When organizational affiliations involve disregard for Scriptural truth, then unity can no longer be on a Scriptural 49 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Page 75 **; Also expressed in interviews with ministers of the Apostolic Christian Church (Nazarene) basis, but at best can only develop social ties and pressures.56 Love for fellow church members is promoted as an
acceptance and tolerance for differences in beliefs and lifestyles.57
Most dissertations on unity have been written in an effort to maintain the organizational status quo rather than to face the very evident truth that things have drifted almost beyond the point of return. This effort to maintain the status quo is a call to maintain unity in the midst of disunity.58 Some who clearly set forth the serious conditions that we face are still asking for unity in spite of all the difference of doctrine that is so evident among us.59
Eventually, unity is taught to be a oneness with other denominations as a part of the ecumenical portion of the transition.”60 Unity among the global Body of Christ is an indispensable requirement of the Gospel.61

The Promotion of Change as Inevitable
As change occurs in the transition, an effort is made to portray change as not only inevitable, but even
desirable. Effort is made to display evidence of past change in church history and point out the benefits that
ensued. A changing society and its associated growing complexity are cited as reasons for change. We believe that people who are trying to meet the cultural standards of the day and who are employing popular methods of attaining to this cultural standard, will give little evidence of the resurrection power of Christ.62 The educational level of church members, especially in more recent times, also becomes a reason to embrace change.
Change also requires the diminishment of the old in order to introduce and enhance the new. The fallibility,
errors, and changed positions of church fathers are pointed out to demonstrate the supposed changeable and
uncertain nature of the church’s foundation. One church summarized the need to separate from the past in
this way: “In summary, a choice stood before the original followers. Either they could open themselves towards the Evangelical Free churches and become part of the evangelical movement, or they could persist with ‘separation’ and pay the price of a substantial reduction in membership.” 63
Apostolic believers in this environment call out for a strengthening of the old: “The future of our churches will not be in the introducing of something new, but in the strengthening of the old, time‐tried and tested traditions of our fathers that have maintained Gospel truth throughout each generation until now, within the context of Scriptural tradition.”64

A Changing Ministry
“Ministers in the early history of the Apostolic Believing churches were chosen by lot from the congregation were self‐educated in the Scriptures; unsalaried; and preached without advance preparation.”65 As the transition progresses, the ministry changes to meet the expectations of a changing congregation and the changing beliefs of the ministers themselves. Preaching about sin, hell, repentance, and an overcoming lifestyle becomes viewed as harsh, judgmental, and negative. “Men have developed the power of oratory and have learned to sway audiences by playing on the senses and emotions. But only the soul‐searching, sincondemning preaching of the Spirit, will bring men to conviction, repentance, and rebirth.”66 Preaching about love, caring, accepting, and an ever‐increasing evangelical doctrine becomes the norm. Sermons become sprinkled with humor and storytelling. An increasing amount of the ministry is prepared in advance through notes, topical Bible studies, and eventually leads to fully prepared sermons, and finally theological training.67
“The ongoing improvement in the educational level in society and among the church members caused an everincreasing challenge for the ministers who consciously renounced any theological training. They became less and less capable of responding to the inquiries of a better‐educated public.68 Some of the older traditional ministers felt intimidated by the more articulate progressives and kept silent as radical changes were instituted in the churches and the denomination.”69

Outreach Becomes Central ‐ A Departure from Separation
In the earliest stages of an Apostolic Believing church’s founding, doctrinal outreach was a necessity for
growth of the church. Both the ministers and their doctrine manifested every aspect of Apostolic Believing
church beliefs.70 Outreach consisted not only in telling people about Jesus, but expounding the need for
repentance, conversion, baptism, and a sanctified lifestyle. The effort did not end with the preaching of
salvation, but encompassed a complete shepherding of individuals through repentance and conversion and an ongoing spiritual effort until life’s end.
In time, some of the Apostolic Believing churches became more closed regarding outreach. Probably the
biggest factor was a concern about ecumenical involvement. As the transition to evangelicalism progresses,
gospel outreach became a growing and almost urgent element of the denomination. One church in transition described it this way: “Now the New Testament is unmistakable that Christians will help mankind. Our love to Christ is measured by our behavior toward men. But always our love is first to Christ and our service to mankind grows out of that. Placed in reverse, in the manner the new conference leadership tended to do, Bible doctrine is not faithfully applied, and the service and relief organizations of the church become more important than spiritual teaching and fruit bearing. Many missions, whether organized and maintained by conferences, churches, or individuals, followed the new trends with programs to meet the physical and emotional needs of society while emphasizing the spiritual needs less and less. They no longer expected to be at enmity with the world or to suffer for the name of Christ. Their desire shifted from obedience to the principles and doctrine of Scripture, to adapting to the world in which they lived.”71 One transitional church stated that mission work is the essence of congregation.72
Material relief outreach also changed during the transition. In the Apostolic Believing church, material
outreach/giving was conducted in secret. “This segment of church outreach evolved to innovative and
demonstrative methods to collect money and materials for its projects. The principle of giving in secret was
compromised, but its projects were supported and its causes were advertised.”73
One of the outcomes of expanded outreach is an ever‐increasing association with other organizations and
denominations. The New Evangelical (ETG) church describes the joining together of numerous relief
organizations from various church groups74. Since it functioned by joining together divergent groups into its relief efforts, the leavening of worldly influence in any Apostolic Believing group that also participated was hastened75.

Additional Congregations are Established as Part of an Internal Missionary
Process
As the evangelical process occurred in Switzerland, then effort was made to establish congregations to
accommodate those with evangelical desires. Apostolic Anabaptist gatherings were seen as closed and
uninviting for growth. With evangelization there is the endeavor to reach the modern people of today with the Gospel and to remove unnecessary hindrances from the path to becoming a Christian and integrating into a congregation. That is why every traditional church or congregation will have to change if it wants to be evangelistic and inviting. Some congregations have changed so quickly and drastically in the past 20 years that a growing number of members no longer feel at home in their congregations. Changes take place in practically all aspects. Church service, songs, assembly hall design, new member acceptance, communion, congregational discipline; children, preteen, teenager and youth work; private circles and even leadership structures have been affected.76

Denial – It’s Not Happening
As the evidence of an evangelical transition increases, so do the voices of denial at both the leadership and
congregational level. Doctrinal differences are downplayed. Concerns about eroding lifestyles are portrayed
as being overstated, divisive, and an intrusion into some other church or church member’s life. In one
denomination while all of this was happening, the message was “nothing is changing, there is nothing wrong.”77
Administrative differences are used to explain differences in doctrine and other significant issues. Lay
members often deny the transition out of fear of separation, a desire to stay with the status quo, and the
simple belief in the impossibility of a church‐wide departure from the true faith.

Transformation Completed
The transition to a New Evangelical church often comes in little steps, with each step not being a lot worse
than the previous step. If the whole transition was presented at once, it would be rejected. Therefore, the
challenge is for an Apostolic Believing church to take a stand against the transition after one of the small
steps, or at the very beginning of the transition.
The transition from an Apostolic Believing church to a New Evangelical church is a tortuous journey, but in the end history demonstrates that it does become a reality. The timing and specific circumstances vary but the end result is essentially the same:

1. Belief that the shed blood of Christ pays for past, present, and future sins.78
2. Belief that church members continue in sin.
3. Conversions become a matter of accepting Jesus and letting him into your heart. Repentance and
conversion disappear.79
4. Believing that salvation can’t be lost except for apostasy and blasphemy.80
5. Believing in faith alone and that works are meaningless. When once someone turns to Jesus that is
enough.81
6. Theological training and trained ministers become the norm. In 1950 theological training was not
discussed. Today (1995) it is a given.82
7. Laying on of hands has no sacramental effect.83
8. Outreach and missionary work become all consuming. The Swiss ETG church expressed it as thus;
missionary work is the essence of a congregation.84
9. The 1995 ETG mission statement has three components: presence, evangelization, and mission/social
welfare.85
10. Moving from a very limited interaction with other churches to a completely open church. In 1963 the
Swiss church rejected any form of interaction with other congregations and churches. Today, 1995, it is an open free church that is a member of the Association of Evangelical Free churches and collaborates
with Christians of other denominations.86
11. There are no congregational disciplinary measures.87
12. No formal guidelines from leadership on:
o Wearing jewelry, especially wedding rings
o Participating in sports and wearing athletic clothing
o Hairstyle and fashion88
13. The rules for partner selection, i.e. proposing via an elder have been lifted for a long time.89
14. Later, under the influence of theological traditions, the conception of non‐resistance increasingly
disappeared. Non‐resistance was seen as an Anabaptist tradition and in the sixties and seventies they
increasingly wanted to distance themselves from traditions.90
15. Today, leadership makes no rules for cinema, radio or television. The topic (media) was not raised at
the elder conventions in the seventies and eighties.91
16. What the congregation in Reinach had attempted in 1930, namely not practicing the holy kiss and
kneeling in prayer out of consideration for guests in public church services, now established itself in all
congregations. The traditions of women having to cover their heads during church service was also
abandoned.92
17. Church services itself also changed. Insider jargon, the simple direct liturgy, separate seating for men
and women, and much more were now things of the past. Church services have become lively and
diverse, such that guests also feel welcome now.93
18. The first organs were introduced slowly, and only used for entrance and exit music. However, increasing
attendance of people not from the AAC(Apostolic Anabaptist Congregations) traditions in the
congregations has made it inevitable to accompany singing, as this does not exactly promote four‐voice
singing.94
19. The songs being sung have also changed. The youth developed a desire for modern songs. Over the
years, many congregations began to use modern songbooks in addition to the traditional songbooks.95
20. The old tradition of spending the entire day on Sunday in “assembly” disappeared. Thus one of the
identifying characteristics of Apostolic Anabaptist congregations, i.e. eating lunch together, has
somewhat fallen into the background.96
21. Holy communion with other churches.97
22. Marriage to other church (denominations) members.98
23. Family planning.99

What Happens to the Apostolic Believing Church Members?
While the result of the evangelical transition is fairly consistent throughout time and over many churches, the fate of the Apostolic Believing portion of the church varies widely. It depends primarily on how “awake” some church leaders and congregational members were and whether there was enough strength and resolve to somehow disengage from the transition process in time. Following are some of the results.

â____Separation of fairly complete congregations including leadership. This separation takes place before the New Evangelical movement impacts all the congregations in a denomination100. It is usually
accomplished because those in leadership are willing to lead this effort and do it in a timely manner.
One denomination called out for leadership thusly: “If a few faithful leaders would stir themselves and
be willing to accept persecution that the Bible promises, revival of truth and sound practices could yet
be effected.”101
Formation of separate conferences. This does not involve a complete separation but leaves in place
some of the interactions between the two conferences. It avoids the complete excommunication of
Apostolic Believing members102.
Restricting certain interaction and authority. In this type of separation, a congregation or
congregations no longer share the pulpit or communion with evangelical congregations. Church
authority rests with the individual congregations. This type of separation usually leads over time to a
full separation, but again without excommunication of Apostolic Believing members.
Fragmented small groups leaving. This separation usually involves small groups of members
scattered throughout the denomination. Sometimes these members are not accompanied or led by leadership. Groups not large enough to form congregations gather in homes or other
accommodations. Some groups in geographical proximity form a congregation or congregations.
The ETG churches who have become completely evangelical refer to such groups as remnants of the
intolerant church who are tenaciously committed to Froehlich’s teachings ”103
Staying to the end. Some Apostolic Believing members opt not to leave and remain with their
Apostolic Believing beliefs and practices in an overwhelming evangelistic environment. Without
leadership, limited fellowship, and a small support system, this becomes a very challenging option.
Usually, but not always, those that are older chose this route. One denomination summarized this
option as follows: “Many in the conferences were dissatisfied with the drift, but conference was all they
had ever known. They could always point to faithful preachers who remained with conference. They
knew faithful grandparents who would be heartbroken if they left. They knew that not all was well in
conference, but not all was well outside the conference either. Many of these were faithful to God to
their death, but their children were often lost to the faith.”104
Faithfulness of the True Believer. Yet there were faithful believers who remembered that there has
always been a remnant who "fought a good fight", "finished their course", and "kept the faith"...a
remnant for whom "His mercy endureth forever"; a remnant who in the end "will receive a crown".
Because they were convinced that it pleased their Heavenly Father, those faithful believers banded
together and sincerely tried to lead lives that were holy, free of sin, and separated from the world.
And so the flame of truth again burned brightly.
The impact of children seeing an “example of faithfulness” and the knowledge of historical scriptural
application is described as follows: “But no generation can maintain the faithfulness of their children.
The children must rise up and fight on in the battle of the ages between light and darkness. But the
children can be helped immeasurably to understand issues and make sound judgments in those battles
for truth if they have been provided an example of faithfulness. Thus they can know how others before
them applied the teaching of the Scripture to the issues they faced, and what was the outcome of their
decisions.105


Reference Notes
* ETG (Evangelische Täufergemeinde Gemeinschaft) Website ‐ ETG is the New Evangelical church which
transitioned from the Froehlich churches in Western Europe.
** Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001 ‐ This book documents an Anabaptist/Mennonite
group’s experience with spiritual drift and transition to a New Evangelical doctrine.
*** Interviews with German Brethren (Gemeinschaft Evangelische Taufgesinnte) – the Western
European churches that continue to believe the doctrine of the Apostles, established by Froehlich.
**** A Brief Historical Overview, Virgil Shrock ‐ This book documents an Anabaptist/Mennonite group’s
experience with spiritual drift and transition to a New Evangelical doctrine.
***** Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1996 ‐ This book was written by the New
Evangelical leadership documenting the transition from the Froehlich churches in Europe to the
present New Evangelical church (ETG).


1 Writings of Samuel Froehlich, Meditations of the Epistles of John, Pages 4345, 47
2 Writings of Samuel Froehlich, Meditations of the Epistles of John, Pages 13, 19; Baptismal Truth, Page 108
3 Writings of Samuel Froehlich, Meditations on Ephesians, Page 193
4 Writings of Samuel Froehlich, Meditations of the Epistles of John, Page 206; Evidence, Page 76
5 Writings of Samuel Froehlich, Meditations of the Epistles of John, Pages 46, 489
6 Founadation of our Christian Faith as it is Taught and Practiced in Our Churches, September 18, 1878,
Christian Schlipf and others.
7 Writings of Samuel Froehlich, Old Testament Meditations, Pages 143144
8 Writings of Samuel Froehlich, Meditations on Hebrews, Page 221
9 Writings of Samuel Froehlich, Meditations of the Epistles of John, Pages 735736; Froehlich’s Letter to the Baptists Preacher’s Conference
10 Writings of Samuel Froehlich, Meditations of the Epistles of John, Page 313; Old Testament Meditations, Page 272
11 Winds of Doctrine, Elder Body of the Apostolic Christian Church
12 Expressed in interviews with ministers of the Apostolic Christian Church (Nazarene)
13 Interviews with ministers of the Apostolic Christian Church (Nazarene)
14 Writings of Samuel Froehlich, Meditations of the Epistles of John Volume 1, Page 52
15 Writings of Samuel Froehlich, Meditations of the Epistles of John Volume 1, Page 51
16 Writings of Samuel Froehlich, Meditations of the Epistles of John Volume 1, Page 50
17 Interviews with ministers of the Apostolic Christian Church (Nazarene)
18 ETG (Evangelische Täufergemeinde Gemeinschaft) Website, January 2008 Translation, Page 6 *
19 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Page 48 **
20 ETG (Evangelische Täufergemeinde Gemeinschaft) Website, January 2008 Translation, Page 7 *
21 Interviews with ministers of the Apostolic Christian Church (Nazarene)
22 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Page 156 **
23 Interviews with ministers of the Apostolic Christian Church (Nazarene)
24 Interviews with ministers of the Apostolic Christian Church (Nazarene)
25 Interviews with German Brethren (Gemeinschaft Evangelische Taufgesinnte) ***
26 Interviews with ministers of the Apostolic Christian Church (Nazarene)
27 An Introduction to Old Order & Conservative Mennonite Groups, by Stephen Scott, Copyright 1996, Page 129
28 A Brief Historical Overview, Virgil Shrock, Page 175 ****
29 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Page 44 **; Also expressed in interviews with ministers of
the Apostolic Christian Church (Nazarene)
30 An Introduction to Old Order & Conservative Mennonite Groups, by Stephen Scott, Copyright 1996, Page 154;
Also expressed in interviews with ministers of the Apostolic Christian Church (Nazarene)
31 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Page 45 **
32 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Pages 19‐20 **
33 ETG (Evangelische Täufergemeinde Gemeinschaft) Website, January 2008 Translation, Page 7 *
34 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Page 20 **
35 An Introduction to Old Order & Conservative Mennonite Groups, by Stephen Scott, Copyright 1996, Page 129;
Also expressed in interviews with ministers of the Apostolic Christian Church (Nazarene)
36 A Brief Historical Overview, Virgil Shrock, Page 175 ****
37 Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1992, Page 92 *****; Also expressed in
interviews with German Brethren (Gemeinschaft Evangelische Taufgesinnte) ***
38 Writings of Samuel Froehlich, Meditations on Ephesians, Pages 369‐371
39 A Brief Historical Overview, Virgil Shrock, Page 168‐169 ****
40 A Brief Historical Overview, Virgil Shrock, Page 171 ****
41 Interviews with German Brethren (Gemeinschaft Evangelische Taufgesinnte) ***
42 A Brief Historical Overview, Virgil Shrock, Page 176 ****; Also expressed in interviews with ministers of the
Apostolic Christian Church (Nazarene)
43 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Page 77‐78 **
44 A Brief Historical Overview, Virgil Shrock, Page 175 ****
45 A Brief Historical Overview, Virgil Shrock, Page 171‐172 ****
46 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Page 72 **
47 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Page 73 **
48 A Brief Historical Overview, Virgil Shrock, Page 174 ****
50 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Page 47 **
51 Interviews with ministers of the Apostolic Christian Church (Nazarene)
52 A Brief Historical Overview, Virgil Shrock, Page 176 ****
53 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Page 41 **
54 Interviews with ministers of the Apostolic Christian Church (Nazarene)
55 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Page 46 **
56 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Page 47 **
57 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Pages 43‐46 **
58 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Page 43 **
59 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Page 44‐45 **
60 A Brief Historical Overview, Virgil Shrock, Page 171 ****
61 Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1996, Page 113 *****
62 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Page 63 **
63 ETG (Evangelische Täufergemeinde Gemeinschaft) Website, January 2008 Translation, Page 6 *
64 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Page 26 **
65 An Introduction to Old Order & Conservative Mennonite Groups, by Stephen Scott, Copyright 1996, Page 151
66 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Page 29 **
67 Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1996, Pages 73‐76 *****
68 ETG (Evangelische Täufergemeinde Gemeinschaft) Website, January 2008 Translation, Page 6 *
69 An Introduction to Old Order & Conservative Mennonite Groups, by Stephen Scott, Copyright 1996, Page 151
70 Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1996, Page 6 *****
71 A Brief Historical Overview, Virgil Shrock, Page 174 ****; Also expressed in interviews with ministers of the
Apostolic Christian Church (Nazarene)
72 Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1996, Page 111 *****
73 A Brief Historical Overview, Virgil Shrock, Page 174 ****
74 ETG (Evangelische Täufergemeinde Gemeinschaft) Website, January 2008 Translation, Page 8 *
75 A Brief Historical Overview, Virgil Shrock, Page 173 ****
76 Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1996, Pages 67‐72 *****
77 Interviews with ministers of the Apostolic Christian Church (Nazarene)
78 Interviews with German Brethren (Gemeinschaft Evangelische Taufgesinnte) ***
79 Interviews with German Brethren (Gemeinschaft Evangelische Taufgesinnte) ***
80 Interviews with German Brethren (Gemeinschaft Evangelische Taufgesinnte) ***
81 Interviews with German Brethren (Gemeinschaft Evangelische Taufgesinnte) ***
82 Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1996, Page 73 *****
83 Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1996, Page 105 *****
84 Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1996, Page 111 *****
85 Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1996, Page 120 *****
86 Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1996, Page 82 *****; Also expressed in
interviews with German Brethren (Gemeinschaft Evangelische Taufgesinnte) ***
87 Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1996, Page 80 *****
88 Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1996, Page 80 *****
89 Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1996, Page 80 *****
90 Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1996, Page 80 *****
91 Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1996, Page 79 *****
92 Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1996, Page 92 *****; Also expressed in
interviews with German Brethren (Gemeinschaft Evangelische Taufgesinnte) ***
93 Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1996, Page 92 *****
94 Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1996, Page 92 *****
95 Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1996, Page 92 *****; Also expressed in
interviews with German Brethren (Gemeinschaft Evangelische Taufgesinnte) ***
96 Becoming a Missionary Church, by Bernhard Ott, Copyright 1996, Page 92 *****
97 Interviews with German Brethren (Gemeinschaft Evangelische Taufgesinnte) ***
98 Interviews with German Brethren (Gemeinschaft Evangelische Taufgesinnte) ***
99 Interviews with German Brethren (Gemeinschaft Evangelische Taufgesinnte) ***
100 Interviews with German Brethren (Gemeinschaft Evangelische Taufgesinnte) ***
101 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Page 41 **
102 Interviews with ministers of the Apostolic Christian Church (Nazarene)
103 ETG (Evangelische Täufergemeinde Gemeinschaft) Website, January 2008 Translation, Page 9 *
104 A Brief Historical Overview, Virgil Shrock, Page 176 ****
105 Marching On, by Mervin J. Baer, Copyright 2001, Prelude **